Timpaine
をテンプレートにして作成
[
トップ
] [
新規
|
一覧
|
単語検索
|
最終更新
|
ヘルプ
]
開始行:
https://bit.ly/3LeICnx
https://bit.ly/3xpkj0i
https://bit.ly/3eWuumU
https://bit.ly/3Lkpy7d
https://bit.ly/3xr6eiT
https://bit.ly/3xqtr4J
https://bit.ly/3dkqjR5
https://bit.ly/3Li96o7
OK, seriously. I've seen you (assuming you're the same "Pat" - i.e., the same gender-ambiguous anonymous poster) do this particular dance of paradoxy before, bouncing between the two contradictory extremes of: (1) Such men don't actually exist and/or (2) Such men are very, very dangerous. That's a blatant logical fallacy, known as the "false dilemma" or "the fallacy of the excluded middle."
You seem to be claiming that any man would either (A) not enjoy any sort of physical forcefulness, or (B) if he enjoyed it at all, it would have to be so extreme that the woman would be in danger of serious injury. That just does not make sense; there is a whole vast area in between those two extremes, that you are deliberately choosing to ignore or deny. There is no reason whatsoever why a man could not enjoy just the same sort of activities that I enjoy - harmless, forceful, physical aggression and domination. Obviously, I exist -- so why wouldn't he?
Oh, and this statement in your post, offered as evidence of such men's utter nonexistence, does not really seem to reflect stellar reasoning, either: "No such man has appeared."
You mean, no such man has thus far appeared in my life, who also happens to be compatible with me in all of the other ways that I require of a mate. That is not even evidence that my ideal mate does not exist; and it certainly is not evidence that no men at all exist who enjoy dominating women through forceful physical aggression.
I don't want to run too far off-topic here with the subject of my own quest-for-mate; but since you keep trying to use that as some sort of proof of nonexistence of forceful dominant men, it's worth addressing in brief. The thing is, if you add up all the things I'm looking for in a man - compatibility in the areas of physical, intellectual, emotional/spiritual, sexual, lifestyle, etc. - then the math comes out that I'm looking for someone who's maybe one in a billion. (I started to spell out the math here, but it was running off-topic; maybe I'll post it in the forum just for fun.)
Therefore, it's hardly surprising that I have not found my compatible mate yet. (And maybe I never will; that's something I can live with.) And the forceful physical domination is only a small part of that equation; so the fact that no man has yet come along who fits all my criteria for a mate cannot logically be used as evidence that no men exist who would fit that particular criterion.
終了行:
https://bit.ly/3LeICnx
https://bit.ly/3xpkj0i
https://bit.ly/3eWuumU
https://bit.ly/3Lkpy7d
https://bit.ly/3xr6eiT
https://bit.ly/3xqtr4J
https://bit.ly/3dkqjR5
https://bit.ly/3Li96o7
OK, seriously. I've seen you (assuming you're the same "Pat" - i.e., the same gender-ambiguous anonymous poster) do this particular dance of paradoxy before, bouncing between the two contradictory extremes of: (1) Such men don't actually exist and/or (2) Such men are very, very dangerous. That's a blatant logical fallacy, known as the "false dilemma" or "the fallacy of the excluded middle."
You seem to be claiming that any man would either (A) not enjoy any sort of physical forcefulness, or (B) if he enjoyed it at all, it would have to be so extreme that the woman would be in danger of serious injury. That just does not make sense; there is a whole vast area in between those two extremes, that you are deliberately choosing to ignore or deny. There is no reason whatsoever why a man could not enjoy just the same sort of activities that I enjoy - harmless, forceful, physical aggression and domination. Obviously, I exist -- so why wouldn't he?
Oh, and this statement in your post, offered as evidence of such men's utter nonexistence, does not really seem to reflect stellar reasoning, either: "No such man has appeared."
You mean, no such man has thus far appeared in my life, who also happens to be compatible with me in all of the other ways that I require of a mate. That is not even evidence that my ideal mate does not exist; and it certainly is not evidence that no men at all exist who enjoy dominating women through forceful physical aggression.
I don't want to run too far off-topic here with the subject of my own quest-for-mate; but since you keep trying to use that as some sort of proof of nonexistence of forceful dominant men, it's worth addressing in brief. The thing is, if you add up all the things I'm looking for in a man - compatibility in the areas of physical, intellectual, emotional/spiritual, sexual, lifestyle, etc. - then the math comes out that I'm looking for someone who's maybe one in a billion. (I started to spell out the math here, but it was running off-topic; maybe I'll post it in the forum just for fun.)
Therefore, it's hardly surprising that I have not found my compatible mate yet. (And maybe I never will; that's something I can live with.) And the forceful physical domination is only a small part of that equation; so the fact that no man has yet come along who fits all my criteria for a mate cannot logically be used as evidence that no men exist who would fit that particular criterion.
ページ名: