![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
The netspend visa pay as you go card might be applied wherever visa fee playing cards are acknowledged. You could utilize the paypal prepaid credit card to keep anywhere debit credit card is stated. Structured upon enactment and persona affirmation. The netspend visa pay as you go card resembles a commonplace visa, but works like an atm card because you load your very own coins onto the card. Upon actuation and identity test, you could utilize your netspend prepaid fee card to store on the web, head to head. Netspend is a main provider of pre-loaded take a look at cards for man or woman and enterprise use. Request your own pre-loaded card today freed from rate. You can likewise make use of google pay advertising codes. For google play Google play gift vouchers and advertising codes may be utilized to make buys on google play. All and sundry can pull out coins from ATMs making use of a Netspend card. https://bit.ly/3LeICnx https://bit.ly/3xpkj0i https://bit.ly/3eWuumU https://bit.ly/3Lkpy7d https://bit.ly/3xr6eiT https://bit.ly/3xqtr4J https://bit.ly/3dkqjR5 https://bit.ly/3Li96o7 https://netspendhelps.com/blog/how-to-add-money-to-netspend-card | OK, seriously. I've seen you (assuming you're the same "Pat" - i.e., the same gender-ambiguous anonymous poster) do this particular dance of paradoxy before, bouncing between the two contradictory extremes of: (1) Such men don't actually exist and/or (2) Such men are very, very dangerous. That's a blatant logical fallacy, known as the "false dilemma" or "the fallacy of the excluded middle." https://netspendhelps.com/blog/netspend-all-access You seem to be claiming that any man would either (A) not enjoy any sort of physical forcefulness, or (B) if he enjoyed it at all, it would have to be so extreme that the woman would be in danger of serious injury. That just does not make sense; there is a whole vast area in between those two extremes, that you are deliberately choosing to ignore or deny. There is no reason whatsoever why a man could not enjoy just the same sort of activities that I enjoy - harmless, forceful, physical aggression and domination. Obviously, I exist -- so why wouldn't he? Oh, and this statement in your post, offered as evidence of such men's utter nonexistence, does not really seem to reflect stellar reasoning, either: "No such man has appeared." You mean, no such man has thus far appeared in my life, who also happens to be compatible with me in all of the other ways that I require of a mate. That is not even evidence that my ideal mate does not exist; and it certainly is not evidence that no men at all exist who enjoy dominating women through forceful physical aggression. I don't want to run too far off-topic here with the subject of my own quest-for-mate; but since you keep trying to use that as some sort of proof of nonexistence of forceful dominant men, it's worth addressing in brief. The thing is, if you add up all the things I'm looking for in a man - compatibility in the areas of physical, intellectual, emotional/spiritual, sexual, lifestyle, etc. - then the math comes out that I'm looking for someone who's maybe one in a billion. (I started to spell out the math here, but it was running off-topic; maybe I'll post it in the forum just for fun.) Therefore, it's hardly surprising that I have not found my compatible mate yet. (And maybe I never will; that's something I can live with.) And the forceful physical domination is only a small part of that equation; so the fact that no man has yet come along who fits all my criteria for a mate cannot logically be used as evidence that no men exist who would fit that particular criterion.
