![[PukiWiki]](image/pukiwiki.png "[PukiWiki]")
https://bit.ly/3NaiyLc https://bit.ly/3VXmJhk https://bit.ly/3W8PpE7 https://bit.ly/3Naiz1I https://bit.ly/3Nb6OYN https://bit.ly/3gKIBMU https://bit.ly/3DBFiRg https://bit.ly/3svHTFR http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LysistrataGambit “The trouble with the college girls is that the very idea of feminine behavior, particularly the submissiveness, has become so repugnant to them that they can’t even fake it to coax a relationship out of a guy.” why should they when they are in an equivalent position or even better since school? 85namae nanka November 9, 2012 at 4:52 am and of course the evidence that’s out in the open now, patriarchal societies have rigidity about sex and marriage, the ones with emancipated women don’t, so how exactly can Lysistrata be true today even if it weren’t before? As Daniel Amneus writes about Gilder’s Fallacy: ‘Most of the male disrupters had mothers who undermined patriarchal sexual stability by divorce, marital disloyalty, or promiscuity. It is the female who initiates the cycle which culminates in the visible male disruption. Gilder blames the male; the law imprisons the male; and as crime continues to increase undeterred by punishment, society imagines it must compensate for the withdrawal of males from the system by increased subsidization of females–subsidization which causes them to imagine themselves independent of males and free to follow the Promiscuity Principle. Improperly socialized women like things this way because they lack the long-term horizons Gilder ascribes to them. ‘ http://www.fisheaters.com/gb7.html “That’s a fascinating statement considering that I cannot imagine you would take seriously an economic plan based on replacing nuclear and coal-fired plants with harnessed unicorns.” Unwin’s Sex and Culture http://blog.jim.com/culture/christianity-yields-to-zoism.html 86Höllenhund November 9, 2012 at 5:57 am „I think some women find femininity repugnant (I had a swarm of radfem knitters here just last week despising a post urging femininity), but I think many more literally have no idea how to go about being feminine.” I’d say that is the defining characteristic of a sizable segment, probably the majority, of the demographic you’re discussing i.e. college-educated middle-class single women. I’d also point out, though, there there apparently is a smaller but still sizable segment that simply cannot be bothered to do what it takes to elicit the commitment of men they find attractive, because it’s too much work and the incentives just aren’t there – one-on-one male economic provisioning is less and less important, being in a relationship with a beta no longer carries any social status, no man from the top 10% will commit to some woman from the bottom 90% either way etc. So unless we consider the small minority that is rabidly feminist, it’s indeed not about repugnance, but ignorance and indifference.
