https://bit.ly/3NaiyLc
 https://bit.ly/3VXmJhk
 https://bit.ly/3W8PpE7
 https://bit.ly/3Naiz1I
 https://bit.ly/3Nb6OYN
 https://bit.ly/3gKIBMU
 https://bit.ly/3DBFiRg
 https://bit.ly/3svHTFR
 https://bit.ly/3y1od2R
 https://bit.ly/3Us0joD
 https://bit.ly/3UnDoLc
 https://bit.ly/4dq8Wsg
 https://bit.ly/3Uq0iS1
 https://bit.ly/3UkYolL
 https://bit.ly/3UoOLCr
 https://bit.ly/3UoOIXh
 https://bit.ly/3UmoLaN
 https://bit.ly/4aZpJ3R
 https://bit.ly/3y2lGFw
 
 http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/LysistrataGambit
 I assumed he would come down on the Saturday morning and head home on Sunday some time. But on Friday when he sent me a text saying “Can you talk 2024-05-02 (木) 23:37:38” I was a little worried that he was going to cancel.
 
 “The trouble with the college girls is that the very idea of feminine behavior, particularly the submissiveness, has become so repugnant to them that they can’t even fake it to coax a relationship out of a guy.”
 I went into a meeting room at work and called him. “I need to be open with you about something before I come down.” Oh shit. Oh shit. “Yes?” (As casually as I could manage with my face scrunched in a ball)
 
 why should they when they are in an equivalent position or even better since school?
 “Yeah, it’s just, well, I had kind of agreed to see this girl on Sunday. I’ve been chatting to her for ages online, and I cancelled on her a while ago, and I can’t really cancel on her again. Not that I want to cancel on her, but I feel kind of dodgy going from your house on Sunday to then go and see her.”
 
 85namae nanka November 9, 2012 at 4:52 am
 and of course the evidence that’s out in the open now, patriarchal societies have rigidity about sex and marriage, the ones with emancipated women don’t, so how exactly can Lysistrata be true today even if it weren’t before?
 “I’m seeing other people too.”
 
 As Daniel Amneus writes about Gilder’s Fallacy:
 “Oh. Really? You’re okay with it?”
 
 ‘Most of the male disrupters had mothers who undermined patriarchal sexual stability by divorce, marital disloyalty, or promiscuity. It is the female who initiates the cycle which culminates in the visible male disruption. Gilder blames the male; the law imprisons the male; and as crime continues to increase undeterred by punishment, society imagines it must compensate for the withdrawal of males from the system by increased subsidization of females–subsidization which causes them to imagine themselves independent of males and free to follow the Promiscuity Principle. Improperly socialized women like things this way because they lack the long-term horizons Gilder ascribes to them. ‘
 “Ummm. Yeah. I’m not expecting anything exclusive with you. Not this early.”
 
 http://www.fisheaters.com/gb7.html
 “Oh, really? Cool. Okay, cool. I can be there by 9:30 tonight, is that okay?”
 
 “That’s a fascinating statement considering that I cannot imagine you would take seriously an economic plan based on replacing nuclear and coal-fired plants with harnessed unicorns.”
 I freaked out. Not about the dating another girl. That was fine. I was being honest, I really didn’t care. Hell, I had spent the week dating two other guys! That wasn’t the issue.
 
 Unwin’s Sex and Culture
 The issue was that my house was a mess. I assumed he was coming Saturday and had planned to clean up in the morning. I was supposed to go to the German Club for drinks that night. When was I going to clean!?!
 
 http://blog.jim.com/culture/christianity-yields-to-zoism.html
 I called my friend who I was supposed to be meeting for drinks. My message on her voice mail went something like this:
 
 86Höllenhund November 9, 2012 at 5:57 am
 „I think some women find femininity repugnant (I had a swarm of radfem knitters here just last week despising a post urging femininity), but I think many more literally have no idea how to go about being feminine.”
 
 I’d say that is the defining characteristic of a sizable segment, probably the majority, of the demographic you’re discussing i.e. college-educated middle-class single women. I’d also point out, though, there there apparently is a smaller but still sizable segment that simply cannot be bothered to do what it takes to elicit the commitment of men they find attractive, because it’s too much work and the incentives just aren’t there – one-on-one male economic provisioning is less and less important, being in a relationship with a beta no longer carries any social status, no man from the top 10% will commit to some woman from the bottom 90% either way etc. So unless we consider the small minority that is rabidly feminist, it’s indeed not about repugnance, but ignorance and indifference.
トップ   新規 一覧 単語検索 最終更新   ヘルプ   最終更新のRSS